Borja Thyssen reportedly settles debt dispute with MoraBanc

The baroness’s son reportedly resolved the dispute through his lawyer before the end of August, although bank sources deny the debt has been paid

ARXIU | Borja Thyssen
ARXIU | Borja Thyssen
por el autor Joel Picón
2 minutos de lectura
Publicado el Wednesday, 2 September 2026 - 09:57

Borja Thyssen has reportedly resolved his financial dispute with MoraBanc, according to Informalia. Negotiations conducted through his lawyer are said to have settled the claim before the end of August and led to the withdrawal of the lawsuit.

The report suggests a conclusion to the dispute that became public this summer. However, it does not specify the final amount paid or the terms of the reported settlement.

Bank sources have told La Veu Lliure that the debt has not been paid, contradicting Informalia’s account of the dispute’s supposed resolution.

An initial loan of €7 million

According to Informalia, the dispute dates back to 2016, when the baroness’s son took out an initial loan of €7 million from MoraBanc, using his Andorran home as collateral.

The same account states that disagreements subsequently arose between the parties, reportedly resulting in missed payments and the bank filing a legal claim. The original loan amount does not necessarily correspond to the outstanding debt allegedly claimed by the bank.

La Veu Lliure first reported MoraBanc’s claim against Borja Thyssen, a story subsequently covered by El Economista without crediting this publication.

The family’s relationship with the bank

The article suggests that Carmen Thyssen’s banking relationship with MoraBanc may have played a role in resolving the dispute. It also mentions other conditions that reportedly helped secure an agreement, without providing details.

According to sources close to the family cited by the journalist, Borja Thyssen is expected to continue staying at his Andorran home after the summer.

The published report provides neither direct confirmation from MoraBanc nor a court ruling clarifying the terms under which the lawsuit was reportedly withdrawn.

 

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Related news